Abstract

Aim: In this study, we compared the single-plate technique (with suturing of small fragments) and the double-plate technique, that we applied to patients who underwent surgery for comminuted clavicle fractures, in terms of fracture healing, early return to work, and the need for secondary surgery due to plate irritation.

Materials and Methods: All patients who underwent surgery due to clavicle fracture between 2018 and 2023 were evaluated retrospectively. A total of 107 patients who came for regular check-ups and were under our follow-up were evaluated. Fifteen patients with comminuted shaft fractures who were fixed with a 3.5 mm plate superiorly and a 2.4 mm mini plate anteriorly, and 19 patients who were fixed with a 3.5 mm single-plate superiorly and 2.0 Ethibond sutures, were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to single/double-plate application. Patients in Group 1 received a 3.5 mm Locking Compression Plate (LCP) single-plate application superiorly followed by a doubled-suture Nice knot (described by Boileau et al.) (Figure 1). In Group 2, patients received a superior 3.5 mm LCP plate followed by an anterior 2.4 mm mini plate (Figure 2).

Results: Significant differences were observed between patients with single-plate and double-plate applications in terms of various clinical recovery times, return to work times, and plate removal requirements. The clinical recovery time was significantly faster in the double-plate group [6 (IQR: 5-7) weeks vs. 4 (IQR: 4-5) weeks, p < 0.001]. The time to return to work was similarly shorter in the double-plate group [8 (IQR: 7-8) weeks vs. 7 (IQR: 6-7) weeks, p = 0.001]. The need for plate removal was significantly higher in the double-plate group (p = 0.016), with 73.3% (n=11/15) of patients requiring plate removal, compared to 31.6% (n=6/19) in the single-plate group.

Conclusion: In addition to superior plating in the fixation of comminuted clavicle fractures, the application of a mini plate from the anterior for fixation of the butterfly fragment allows for earlier rehabilitation and a rapid return to work. However, the risk of a second operation due to plate irritation should also be considered. No negative effect of fixation of small fragments with sutures on fracture union was observed. If the situation of the soft tissue is not well, a single-plate can be used in comminuted fractures. However, in cases where fixation is not enough, double-plate is a procedure that can be applied safely.

Keywords: Clavicle, double-plate application, fracture, outcome

Copyright and license

Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). This is an open-access article published by Bolu İzzet Baysal Training and Research Hospital under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite

1.
Ayanoğlu T, Ünal HA, Kalaycıoğlu O. Clinical and radiological comparison of single and double-plate fixation in comminuted clavicular shaft fractures. Northwestern Med J. 2025;5(3):151-5. https://doi.org/10.54307/2025.NWMJ.188

References

  1. Bhardwaj A, Sharma G, Patil A, Rahate V. Comparison of plate osteosynthesis versus non-operative management for mid-shaft clavicle fractures-A prospective study. Injury. 2018; 49(6): 1104-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.04.012
  2. Zhuang Y, Zhang Y, Zhou L, Zhang J, Jiang G, Wu J. Management of comminuted mid-shaft clavicular fractures: Comparison between dual-plate fixation treatment and single-plate fixation. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020; 28(2): 2309499020915797. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499020915797
  3. Ju WN, Wang CX, Wang TJ, Qi BC. Fixation of comminuted midshaft clavicle fractures with bone fragments separated by soft tissue using a novel double ligature technique: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(45): e8606. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008606
  4. Zielinski E, Doe K, Perdue P. Dual Plate Minifragment Fixation of Clavicle Fractures- Technique and Approach. J Orthop Trauma. 2022; 36(Suppl 3): S1-2. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002389
  5. Kitzen J, Paulson K, Korley R, Duffy P, Martin CR, Schneider PS. Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Plate Configurations for Midshaft Clavicle Fracture Fixation: Single Plating Compared with Dual Mini-Fragment Plating. JB JS Open Access. 2022; 7(1): e21.00123. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00123
  6. Charles SJ, Kumar P, Reddy RP, et al. Dual Versus Single Plate Fixation of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023; 105(23): 1886-96. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.23.00338
  7. Leroux T, Wasserstein D, Henry P, et al. Rate of and Risk Factors for Reoperations After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: A Population-Based Study in Ontario, Canada. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96(13): 1119-25. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00607
  8. Wijdicks FJG, Van der Meijden OAJ, Millett PJ, Verleisdonk EJMM, Houwert RM. Systematic review of the complications of plate fixation of clavicle fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012; 132(5): 617-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1456-5
  9. Sheth U, Fernandez CE, Morgan AM, Henry P, Nam D. Are two plates better than one? A systematic review of dual plating for acute midshaft clavicle fractures. Shoulder Elbow. 2022; 14(5): 500-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732211002495
  10. DeBaun MR, Chen MJ, Campbell ST, et al. Dual Mini-Fragment Plating Is Comparable With Precontoured Small Fragment Plating for Operative Diaphyseal Clavicle Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Orthop Trauma. 2020; 34(7): e229-32. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001727
  11. Meeuwis MA, Pull Ter Gunne AF, Verhofstad MHJ, van der Heijden FHWM. Construct failure after open reduction and plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. Injury. 2017; 48(3): 715-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.01.040
  12. Boyce GN, Philpott AJ, Ackland DC, Ek ET. Single versus dual orthogonal plating for comminuted midshaft clavicle fractures: a biomechanics study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020; 15(1): 248. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01771-x
  13. Allis JB, Cheung EC, Farrell ED, Johnson EE, Jeffcoat DM. Dual Versus Single-Plate Fixation of Midshaft Clavicular Fractures: A Retrospective Comparative Study. JB JS Open Access. 2020; 5(2): e0043. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00043
  14. Drosdowech DS, Manwell SEE, Ferreira LM, Goel DP, Faber KJ, Johnson JA. Biomechanical analysis of fixation of middle third fractures of the clavicle. J Orthop Trauma. 2011; 25(1): 39-43. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181d8893a
  15. Boileau P, Alami G, Rumian A, Schwartz DG, Trojani C, Seidl AJ. The Doubled-Suture Nice Knot. Orthopedics. 2017; 40(2): e382-6. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20161202-05
  16. Wu G, Chen YQ, Chen CY, et al. Clinical outcomes of doubled-suture Nice knot augmented plate fixation in the treatment of comminuted midshaft clavicle fracture. BMC Surg. 2021; 21(1): 270. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01274-4