Abstract

Aim: Benign laryngeal lesions are non-neoplastic growths of abnormal tissue on the laryngeal mucosa. They are significant because they can affect the laryngeal functions of voice production, respiration, and deglutition. This study aims to present the histopathological and clinical data of patients diagnosed with benign vocal cord lesions who were followed up and underwent surgical treatment in our tertiary referral center, evaluate the distribution percentages, and assess the pathological findings in relation to age and gender.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted by evaluating the medical records of patients who were diagnosed with benign vocal cord lesions between October 2014 and May 2019 at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University.

Results: Of the 329 patients included in the study, 235 (71.4%) were male, and 94 (28.6%) were female. The mean age of the patients was 48.6 (±13.62) years. Histopathological evaluation revealed that the most common diagnosis was vocal cord polyp in 223 patients (67.8%). The second most common pathology was vocal cord nodule, observed in 23 patients (7.0%). This was followed by Reinke’s edema in 21 patients (6.4%) and intracordal cyst in 20 patients (6.1%). No significant relationship was found between gender and the distribution of vocal cord biopsy results. However, a significant relationship was found between age groups and pathology distribution (p < 0.001). In particular, Reinke’s edema and active chronic inflammation were more frequently observed in patients aged 49 and above.

Conclusion: Among patients with benign vocal cord lesions, vocal cord polyps are the most frequently encountered pathology. With increasing age, the diagnostic diversity of benign lesions also increases. Reinke’s edema and inflammatory lesions are more frequently observed in older individuals.

Keywords: benign lesions, microlaryngeal surgery, nodule, polyp, vocal cords

Copyright and license

How to cite

1.
Çobanoğlu HB, Keskin K, Köprücü ER, Turgut Semerci H. Benign laryngeal lesions: review of 329 cases in a single center. Northwestern Med J. 2026;6(1):332-7. https://doi.org/10.54307/2025.NWMJ.200

References

  1. Patrial MTCRDO, Hamerschmidt R, Matias JEF, Filho EDDM, Carvalho B. Analysis of Surgical Recurrence after Larynx Microsurgery for Benign Lesions. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020; 25(4): e496-503. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1718529
  2. Wani AA, Rehman A, Hamid S, Akhter M, Baseena S. Benign mucosal fold lesion as a cause of hoarseness of voice-a clinical study. Otolaryngology. 2012; 2: 120. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-119X.1000120
  3. Singhal P, Bhandari A, Chouhan M, Sharma MP, Sharma S. Benign tumors of the larynx: a clinical study of 50 cases. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009; 61(Suppl 1): 26-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-009-0013-9
  4. Noordzij JP, Woo P. Glottal area waveform analysis of benign vocal fold lesions before and after surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000; 109(5): 441-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940010900501
  5. Kunieda C, Kanazawa T, Komazawa D, et al. The Correlation between the Size of Vocal Polyps, Vocal Nodules and Vocal Dysfunction, before and after Laryngeal Microsurgery. Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 2015; 118(10): 1212-9. https://doi.org/10.3950/jibiinkoka.118.1212
  6. Byeon H. Relationships among smoking, organic, and functional voice disorders in Korean general population. J Voice. 2015; 29(3): 312-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.07.015
  7. Sachdeva H, Nirupama M, Padmanabha N, et al. Histopathological Study of Benign Tumours of the Larynx: A Descriptive Study in Coastal Karnataka. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022; 74(Suppl 2): 2019-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-01979-7
  8. Hegde MC, Kamath MP, Bhojwani K, Peter R, Babu PR. Benign lesions of larynx-A clinical study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 57(1): 35-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02907624
  9. McGlashen J. Disorders of the voice. In: Hibbert J, editor. Scott-Brown Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. 7th ed. London: Edward Arnold; 2008: 2192-2210. https://doi.org/10.1201/b15118-185
  10. Altman KW. Vocal fold masses. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2007; 40(5): 1091-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2007.05.011
  11. Poels PJP, de Jong FICRS, Schutte HK. Consistency of the preoperative and intraoperative diagnosis of benign vocal fold lesions. J Voice. 2003; 17(3): 425-33. https://doi.org/10.1067/s0892-1997(03)00010-9
  12. Malik P, Yadav SPS, Sen R, et al. The Clinicopathological Study of Benign Lesions of Vocal Cords. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019; 71(Suppl 1): 212-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-017-1240-0
  13. Vasconcelos DD, Gomes ADOC, Araújo CMTD. Vocal Fold Polyps: Literature Review. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019; 23(1): 116-24. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675391
  14. Martins RHG, do Amaral HA, Tavares ELM, Martins MG, Gonçalves TM, Dias NH. Voice Disorders: Etiology and Diagnosis. J Voice. 2016; 30(6): 761.e1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.09.017
  15. Baali MH, Shaheen MH, Khan MF, Neazy AA, Basyuni MA, Altowairqi A. Optimizing Management Strategies for Vocal Cord Nodules: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2024; 16(12): e75916. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.75916
  16. Shofoluwe NA, Lawal J, Quadri OR, et al. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Benign Laryngeal Lesions: Insights from a Decade of Experience in a Tertiary Hospital. Niger Med J. 2025; 65(6): 961-72.
  17. Zhukhovitskaya A, Battaglia D, Khosla SM, Murry T, Sulica L. Gender and age in benign vocal fold lesions. Laryngoscope. 2015; 125(1): 191-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24911
  18. Barmak E, Altan E, Yılmaz Z, Korkmaz MH, Çadallı Tatar E. Impact of the Severity of Reinke’s Edema on the Parameters of Voice. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023; 61(4): 166-74. https://doi.org/10.4274/tao.2023.2023-8-10
  19. Paltura C, Güvenç A, Bektaş S, Develioğlu Ö, Külekçi M. Risk Factors and Diagnostic Methods in Vocal Cord Mucosal Lesions. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2019; 53(1): 49-53. https://doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2019.29291