Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) and titanium-prepared platelet-rich fibrin (T-PRF), placed into extraction sockets after impacted mandibular third molar surgery, on the gingival and pulpal microcirculation of the adjacent mandibular second molar.

Methods: This retrospective comparative clinical study included 60 patients aged 20–30 years with fully impacted mesioangular mandibular third molars. Patients were divided into two groups according to the platelet concentrate used during surgery: L-PRF (n=30) and T-PRF (n=30). Gingival blood flow in the mucoperiosteal flap and pulpal blood flow in the adjacent mandibular second molar were measured with laser Doppler flowmetry, a well-established noninvasive method. Measurements were performed preoperatively and on postoperative day 7. Perfusion values were recorded as perfusion units (PU) and analyzed using non-parametric statistical methods with Bonferroni correction applied for multiple comparisons.

Results: Both the L-PRF and T-PRF groups demonstrated significant increases in pulpal and gingival perfusion values on postoperative day 7 compared with baseline measurements (all Bonferroni-adjusted p<0.001). In the T-PRF group, pulpal perfusion increased by 8.10 PU and gingival perfusion increased by 11.09 PU, whereas the corresponding increases in the L-PRF group were 6.52 PU and 6.81 PU, respectively. Direct intergroup comparison of change scores (postoperative − preoperative) revealed that the increase in both pulpal blood flow (U=759.0; Z=4.568; p<0.001; r=0.590) and gingival blood flow (U=814.0; Z=5.382; p<0.001; r=0.695) was significantly greater in the T-PRF group. Intergroup comparisons further demonstrated higher postoperative perfusion values in the T-PRF group. The largest between-group difference was observed for gingival perfusion (U=900.0; Z=6.653; p<0.001; r=0.859), representing a very large effect size. A moderate effect size was observed for postoperative pulpal perfusion(r=0.332).

Conclusion: Both platelet-rich fibrin protocols were associated with increased gingival and pulpal perfusion during the early postoperative healing period. T-PRF was associated with higher postoperative perfusion measurements, particularly in gingival tissues; this finding may indicate a more pronounced early microcirculatory response. However, because clinical healing outcomes were not directly evaluated and no untreated control group was included, the clinical significance of the observed perfusion differences remains uncertain and should be confirmed by prospective randomized controlled studies.

Keywords: impacted third molar, laser doppler flowmetry, platelet-rich fibrin

Copyright and license

Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). This is an open-access article published by Bolu İzzet Baysal Training and Research Hospital under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite

1.
Meşeci B, Akay N. Laser Doppler evaluation of gingival and pulpal microcirculation after impacted mandibular third molar surgery: A retrospective comparison of L-PRF and T-PRF. Northwestern Med J. 2026;6(4):275-88. https://doi.org/10.54307/NWMJ.2026.243

References

  1. Menziletoglu D, Guler AY, Basturk F, Isik BK, Erdur EA. Comparison of two different flap designs for bilateral impacted mandibular third molar surgery. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 121(4): 368-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2019.08.006
  2. Torul D, Omezli MM, Kahveci K. Evaluation of the effects of concentrated growth factors or advanced platelet rich-fibrin on postoperative pain, edema, and trismus following lower third molar removal: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 121(6): 646-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2020.02.004
  3. Kim JW, Seong TW, Cho S, Kim SJ. Randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of absorbable collagen sponge after extraction of impacted mandibular third molar: split-mouth design. BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20(1): 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-1063-3
  4. He Y, Chen J, Huang Y, Pan Q, Nie M. Local application of platelet-rich fibrin during lower third molar extraction improves treatment outcomes. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 75(12): 2497-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.05.034
  5. Afat IM, Akdoğan ET, Gönül O. Effects of leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin alone and combined with hyaluronic acid on early soft tissue healing after surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: a prospective clinical study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019; 47(2): 280-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2018.11.023
  6. Ratajczak J, Vangansewinkel T, Gervois P, et al. Angiogenic properties of ‘leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin’. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1): 14632. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32936-8
  7. Choukroun J, Diss A, Simonpieri A, et al. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): a second-generation platelet concentrate. Part IV: clinical effects on tissue healing. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 101(3): e56-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.07.011
  8. Dohan Ehrenfest DM, de Peppo GM, Doglioli P, Sammartino G. Slow release of growth factors and thrombospondin-1 in Choukroun’s platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): a gold standard to achieve for all surgical platelet concentrates technologies. Growth Factors. 2009; 27(1): 63-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/08977190802636713
  9. Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Rasmusson L, Albrektsson T. Classification of platelet concentrates: from pure platelet-rich plasma (P-PRP) to leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF). Trends Biotechnol. 2009; 27(3): 158-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.11.009
  10. Dohan DM, Choukroun J, Diss A, et al. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): a second-generation platelet concentrate. Part I: technological concepts and evolution. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 101(3): e37-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.07.008
  11. Tunalı M, Özdemir H, Küçükodacı Z, Akman S, Fıratlı E. In vivo evaluation of titanium-prepared platelet-rich fibrin (T-PRF): a new platelet concentrate. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 51(5): 438-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.08.003
  12. Tunalı M, Özdemir H, Küçükodacı Z, et al. A novel platelet concentrate for guided bone regeneration: titanium prepared platelet-rich fibrin (T-PRF). Gulhane Med J. 2015; 57(2): 102-6. https://doi.org/10.5455/gulhane.173504
  13. Ravi S, Santhanakrishnan M. Mechanical, chemical, structural analysis and comparative release of PDGF-AA from L-PRF, A-PRF and T-PRF - an in vitro study. Biomater Res. 2020; 24: 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-020-00193-4
  14. Bhattacharya HS, Gummaluri SS, Astekar M, Gummaluri RK. Novel method of determining the periodontal regenerative capacity of T-PRF and L-PRF: an immunohistochemical study. Dent Med Probl. 2020; 57(2): 137-44. https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/117721
  15. Ustaoğlu G, Ercan E, Tunali M. The role of titanium-prepared platelet-rich fibrin in palatal mucosal wound healing and histoconduction. Acta Odontol Scand. 2016; 74(7): 558-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2016.1219045
  16. Mitra DK, Potdar PN, Prithyani SS, Rodrigues SV, Shetty GP, Talati MA. Comparative study using autologous platelet-rich fibrin and titanium prepared platelet-rich fibrin in the treatment of infrabony defects: an in vitro and in vivo study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2019; 23(6): 554-61. https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_562_18
  17. Broughton G, Janis JE, Attinger CE. Wound healing: an overview. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 117(7 Suppl): 1e-S-32e-S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000222562.60260.f9
  18. Velnar T, Bailey T, Smrkolj V. The wound healing process: an overview of the cellular and molecular mechanisms. J Int Med Res. 2009; 37(5): 1528-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323000903700531
  19. Kondo T, Ishida Y. Molecular pathology of wound healing. Forensic Sci Int. 2010; 203(1-3): 93-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.07.004
  20. Gazelius B, Olgart L, Edwall B, Edwall L. Non-invasive recording of blood flow in human dental pulp. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1986; 2(5): 219-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1986.tb00148.x
  21. Retzepi M, Tonetti M, Donos N. Gingival blood flow changes following periodontal access flap surgery using laser Doppler flowmetry. J Clin Periodontol. 2007; 34(5): 437-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01062.x
  22. Barry O, Wang Y, Wahl G. Determination of baseline alveolar mucosa perfusion parameters using laser Doppler flowmetry and tissue spectrophotometry in healthy adults. Acta Odontol Scand. 2020; 78(1): 31-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2019.1645353
  23. Naoum S, Goonewardene M, Abbott PV, Karunanayake K, Budgeon C. Changes in pulp blood flow and pulp sensibility resulting from surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: a clinical study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019; 155(5): 632-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.05.025
  24. Juodzbalys G, Daugela P. Mandibular third molar impaction: review of literature and a proposal of a classification. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2013; 4(2): e1. https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2013.4201
  25. Hartmann A, Azérad J, Boucher Y. Environmental effects on laser Doppler pulpal blood-flow measurements in man. Arch Oral Biol. 1996; 41(4): 333-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(95)00133-6
  26. Ramsay DS, Artun J, Martinen SS. Reliability of pulpal blood-flow measurements utilizing laser Doppler flowmetry. J Dent Res. 1991; 70(11): 1427-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345910700110601
  27. Roebuck EM, Evans DJ, Stirrups D, Strang R. The effect of wavelength, bandwidth, and probe design and position on assessing the vitality of anterior teeth with laser Doppler flowmetry. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2000; 10(3): 213-20. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-263x.2000.00194.x