Abstract

Aim: This study aims to underscore the significance of employing multiple parameters from non-contrast abdominal CT scans for the assessment of hepatosteatosis in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Methods: Non-enhanced Computed Tomography of the diabetic subjects were analyzed. Control subjects were selected from non-diabetic patients who had undergone abdominal tomography within the same period. The craniocaudal length of the liver and liver, spleen, pancreas densities, and epicardial adipose tissue were measured. Additionally, patient demographics and laboratory values were retrospectively obtained.

Results: The craniocaudal length of the liver was significantly greater in the diabetes mellitus group compared to the control group (168.3 ± 17.2 mm vs 152.3 ± 14.8 mm, p < 0.001). Hepatosteatosis was observed in 22 individuals with diabetes mellitus, whereas only one participant in the control group had this condition (p < 0.001). The diabetes mellitus group exhibited significantly lower median liver density (p < 0.001), liver-spleen density ratio (p = 0.004), pancreatic head density (p = 0.001), and pancreatic body density (p = 0.013). Additionally, the average thickness of epicardial adipose tissue was markedly higher in the diabetes mellitus group compared to the control group (8.1 ± 1.9 mm vs 4.9 ± 1.1 mm, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: These data indicate an association between hepatosteatosis and increased epicardial adipose tissue thickness, liver and pancreatic densities in individuals with diabetes mellitus. These findings suggest that non-contrast abdominal CT findings such as epicardial adipose tissue thickness and relevant laboratory tests may aid in evaluating metabolic disorders and fat accumulation in diabetic patients.

Keywords: Type 2 diabetes mellitus, hepatosteatosis, liver/spleen ratio, adipose tissue, liver/diagnostic imaging, pericardium/diagnostic imaging, risk factors, spleen/diagnostic imaging

Copyright and license

How to cite

1.
Coşgun Z, Kalfaoğlu ME. Comparative evaluation of hepatosteatosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using non-contrast abdominal CT and laboratory findings. Northwestern Med J. 2024;4(4):188-94. https://doi.org/10.54307/2024.NWMJ.95

References

  1. Whiting DR, Guariguata L, Weil C, Shaw J. IDF diabetes atlas: global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011; 94(3): 311-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2011.10.029
  2. Haligur M, Topsakal S, Ozmen O. Early degenerative effects of diabetes mellitus on pancreas, liver, and kidney in rats: an immunohistochemical study. Exp Diabetes Res. 2012; 2012: 120645. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/120645
  3. Lai RM, Chen TB, Hu YH, Wu G, Zheng Q. Effect of type 2 diabetic mellitus in the prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure patients in China. World J Gastroenterol. 2021; 27(23): 3372-85. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i23.3372
  4. Tomic D, Kemp WW, Roberts SK. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: current concepts, epidemiology and management strategies. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 30(10): 1103-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000001235
  5. Smits MM, Ioannou GN, Boyko EJ, Utzschneider KM. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease as an independent manifestation of the metabolic syndrome: results of a US national survey in three ethnic groups. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 28(4): 664-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.12106
  6. Zhou YY, Zhou XD, Wu SJ, et al. Synergistic increase in cardiovascular risk in diabetes mellitus with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 30(6): 631-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000001075
  7. Ratziu V, Charlotte F, Heurtier A, et al. Sampling variability of liver biopsy in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2005; 128(7): 1898-906. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.084
  8. Johnston RJ, Stamm ER, Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, Archer PG. Diagnosis of fatty infiltration of the liver on contrast enhanced CT: limitations of liver-minus-spleen attenuation difference measurements. Abdom Imaging. 1998; 23(4): 409-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002619900370
  9. Piekarski J, Goldberg HI, Royal SA, Axel L, Moss AA. Difference between liver and spleen CT numbers in the normal adult: its usefulness in predicting the presence of diffuse liver disease. Radiology. 1980; 137(3): 727-9. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.137.3.6934563
  10. Mills SR, Doppman JL, Nienhuis AW. Computed tomography in the diagnosis of disorders of excessive iron storage of the liver. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1977; 1(1): 101-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-197701000-00012
  11. Iwasaki M, Takada Y, Hayashi M, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of graft steatosis in living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2004; 78(10): 1501-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000140499.23683.0d
  12. Emamat H, Tangestani H, Behrad Nasab M, Ghalandari H, Hekmatdoost A. The association between epicardial adipose tissue and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review of existing human studies. EXCLI J. 2021; 20: 1096-105. https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2021-3815
  13. Iacobellis G, Corradi D, Sharma AM. Epicardial adipose tissue: anatomic, biomolecular and clinical relationships with the heart. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2005; 2(10): 536-43. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio0319
  14. Iacobellis G, Leonetti F. Epicardial adipose tissue and insulin resistance in obese subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005; 90(11): 6300-2. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-1087
  15. Iacobellis G. Local and systemic effects of the multifaceted epicardial adipose tissue depot. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015; 11(6): 363-71. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2015.58
  16. Goodman JI. Hepatomegaly and diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 1953; 39(5): 1077-87. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-39-5-1077
  17. Mantovani A, Byrne CD, Bonora E, Targher G. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of incident type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2018; 41(2): 372-82. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-1902
  18. Mellor-Crummey LE, Lake JE, Wilhalme H, et al. A Comparison of the Liver Fat Score and CT Liver-to-Spleen Ratio as Predictors of Fatty Liver Disease by HIV Serostatus. J Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 2(3): 16. https://doi.org/10.21767/2575-7733.1000045
  19. Hokkanen A, Hämäläinen H, Laitinen TM, Laitinen TP. Decreased liver-to-spleen ratio in low-dose computed tomography as a biomarker of fatty liver disease reflects risk for myocardial ischaemia. Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2023; 1(1): qyad016. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyad016
  20. Boyce CJ, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, et al. Hepatic steatosis (fatty liver disease) in asymptomatic adults identified by unenhanced low-dose CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194(3): 623-8. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.2590
  21. Hajsadeghi F, Nabavi V, Bhandari A, et al. Increased epicardial adipose tissue is associated with coronary artery disease and major adverse cardiovascular events. Atherosclerosis. 2014; 237(2): 486-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.09.037